search

CAVD Grantee

Ho VDC 

Title

Safety, Tolerability and Acceptability of Electroporation to Deliver ADVAX, a Clade C/B’ DNA-Based Candidate HIV-1 Vaccine, to Healthy Volunteers 

Meeting

AIDS Vaccine 2008, Cape Town 

Primary Author

Vasan, S 

Author(s)

Sandhya Vasan, Arlene Hurley, Sarah J. Schlesinger, Drew Hannaman, David Gardiner, Daniel Dugin, Yaoxing Huang, Johanne Andersen, Marina Caskey, Claire Evans, Karen Dolter, Claudia Schmidt, Pat Fast, David D. Ho 

Abstract

Background
 DNA-based vaccines have been weakly immunogenic as stand alone vaccines in humans. Delivery of DNA-based vaccines via in vivo electroporation (EP) significantly enhances humoral and cellular immunogenicity over standard intramuscular injection in animal models. We are conducting the first clinical trial of a DNA-based HIV-1 vaccine delivered via EP in healthy HIV-seronegative volunteers.
 
 
 Methods
 Forty healthy individuals aged 18-60, at low risk for HIV-1, are being enrolled into this study. Vaccinations are administered at weeks 0 and 8. Eight volunteers per dosage group (low: 0.2mg; mid: 1.0mg; high: 4.0mg) receive ADVAX via EP with the TriGrid™ Delivery System, while eight volunteers receive saline placebo via EP, in a randomized double-blinded design. An additional eight volunteers receive standard intramuscular vaccination with high dose ADVAX (4.0mg). Volunteers are followed for safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity for 14 months.
 
 
 Results
 Enrollment of the low and mid dosage groups is complete (n=26). Twenty one volunteers have been vaccinated with ADVAX or placebo by EP; five have received ADVAX IM. Ten of ten volunteers have received the second vaccination at week 8. ADVAX or placebo administered by EP has been safe, with no severe local or systemic reactogenicity or serious adverse events to date. Discomfort immediately following EP was significantly reduced after 30 minutes, as assessed by standard tolerability questionnaires. After 31 EP procedures, surveys indicate 97% would accept EP for vaccination against a life-threatening infection such as HIV, while 81% found EP acceptable for vaccination against less severe infections such as influenza. Humoral and cellular immunogenicity assessments are underway.
 
 
 Conclusions
 To date, in vivo electroporation appears safe, well tolerated and acceptable in healthy volunteers.

Website

 

Was this publication authored by individuals from more than one CAVD Consortium?

No 

Collaborating Consortia

 
Attachments
Created at 3/16/2009 12:02 PM  by Hilda Villavicencio 
Last modified at 9/9/2010 9:24 AM  by Brian Sanders